Fecoya.co.uk
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Contact Us
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Fecoya.co.ukFecoya.co.uk
  • Homepage
  • Celebrity
  • Study
  • Travel
  • Stories
  • JOBS
Fecoya.co.uk
Latest

Four Democratic officials were found guilty of corruption involving witness tampering and criminal misuse of absentee ballots.

By World WideApril 14, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

It is not unexpected that four Democratic campaign staffers in Connecticut, a deep blue state that frequently elects Democrats, were found to have misused absentee ballots. Although the incident happened in 2019, they were apprehended, detained, and charged during the summer of 2024.

In a news statement issued on June 11, the Division of Criminal Justice of the State of Connecticut made this announcement. The news announcement started, “Today, Chief State’s Attorney Patrick J. Griffin announced that four campaign workers who participated in the 2019 Bridgeport Democratic mayoral primary have been charged with crimes related to the misuse of absentee ballots.”

“Inspectors from the Statewide Prosecution Bureau in the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney arrested Alfredo Castillo, age 52, Wanda Geter-Pataky, age 67, Nilsa Heredia, age 61, and Josephine Edmonds, age 62, all of Bridgeport, and charged them with Unlawful Possession of Absentee Ballots, in violation of Connecticut General Statues § 9-146b(d), and other election-related charges,” the press release continued, noting the numerous crimes they had committed. Additionally, three of the four suspects are accused of violating Connecticut General Statute Section 53a-151 by tampering with a witness.

The statement went on to describe the charges against each of the four accused employees: “Edmonds, Geter-Pataky, and Heredia were charged with Tampering With a Witness, in violation of Connecticut General Statues § 53a-151; Geter-Pataky, Castillo, and Heredia were charged with Misrepresenting Eligibility Requirements for Voting by Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statues § 9-135(b); Castillo, Edmonds, and Heredia were charged with Failure to Maintain an Absentee Ballot Distribution List, in violation of Connecticut General Statues § 9-140(k)(2); Edmonds and Heredia were charged with being present when an Absentee Ballot Applicant Executes an Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statues § 9-140(b)e; and Geter-Pataky and Castillo were charged with Failure to Sign as Assister on an Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statues § 9-140(a).

According to the press release, the initial accusations against them were made after it was found during a Democratic Party primary that votes had been handled improperly, which prompted an investigation. It stated: “The office of the Secretary of State filed a formal letter of referral to the State Elections Enforcement Commission, or “SEEC,” in response to claims of improper handling of absentee ballots in the September 2019 Democratic primary election for mayor of the City of Bridgeport. On June 7, 2023, a vote was taken to refer evidence of criminal conduct to the Division of Criminal Justice after the SEEC launched a civil inquiry. The Statewide Prosecution Bureau in the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney accepted the referral.

“According to an arrest warrant affidavit, Geter-Pataky is accused of failing to sign as an assister on an absentee ballot application that she had filled out on behalf of a prospective voter and misrepresenting eligibility requirements for voting by absentee ballot when she reportedly told a citizen not to vote in person and that she would pick up the citizen’s absentee ballot,” the press release stated, explaining what criminality occurred with regard to the ballots themselves. The defendant told the citizen not to talk to anyone about the situation, the citizen later told SEEC investigators.

But that’s not all. “Court records show Heredia instructed prospective voters on which candidate to select on their absentee ballots and misrepresented eligibility requirements for voting by absentee ballot,” the court added, noting that one of the defendants failed to submit a distribution list for the improperly handled ballots. The defendant acknowledged to SEEC investigators that she failed to provide the City of Bridgeport Clerk’s Office with an absentee ballot distribution list.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

MY MOTHER-IN-LAW SLAPPED MY SOUP—AND ALMOST DESTROYED MY MARRIAGE

June 26, 2025

The Bush My Dog Chose Changed Everything

June 26, 2025

My Boyfriend Planned A Romantic Weekend At A Luxury Hotel. Everything Felt Perfect—Until Checkout…

June 26, 2025

MY MOTHER-IN-LAW SLAPPED MY SOUP—AND ALMOST DESTROYED MY MARRIAGE

June 26, 2025

The Bush My Dog Chose Changed Everything

June 26, 2025

My Boyfriend Planned A Romantic Weekend At A Luxury Hotel. Everything Felt Perfect—Until Checkout…

June 26, 2025

My Dad Was A Famous Lawyer—But He Left Me Something No One Expected

June 26, 2025
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Contact Us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}