Fecoya.co.uk
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Contact Us
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Fecoya.co.ukFecoya.co.uk
  • Homepage
  • Celebrity
  • Study
  • Travel
  • Stories
  • JOBS
Fecoya.co.uk
Latest

Newt Gingrich Destroys Judge Boasberg in Showcase of Judicial Overreach

By World WideApril 10, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich quickly disproved Judge Boasberg and other federal judges’ flawed arguments and highlighted the judiciary’s bias against President Trump. Mr. Gingrich correctly criticized judges of abusing their power to overturn President Trump’s executive actions and even exposed them for trying to utilize presidential power.

Gingrich testified at a House Judiciary Committee hearing that President Trump’s recent executive actions were legal under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. Mr. Gingrich addressed immigration deportation, birthright citizenship, and other topics that have pitted judges against President Trump.

Mr. Gingrich began his April 1 hearing by highlighting fifteen District Judges’ enormous power grab, including Judge Boasberg. Mr. Gingrich stated, “Fifteen District Judges took over Executive Branch duties in the first six weeks of the current presidency through nationwide injunctions.” This might be a judicial coup. It defies the Constitution and 200 years of American history.”

Mr. Gingrich refused to back down, saying, “Unelected lower-court judges have been steadily grabbing power for years. This threat was so evident that Vince Haley and I wrote “Bringing the Court Back under the Constitution” in 2012. I’m submitting a history study for the Record.”

Mr. Gingrich cited Harvard Law Review to support his claims. From 2001 until 2023, District Courts issued 96 countrywide injunctions. Two-thirds (64), granted under Trump, Also, Democratic presidents appointed 92% of the judges who issued injunctions against Trump.

Mr. Gingrich emphasized the extraordinary 15 injunctions against the Trump administration since January 20, 2025. Gingrich added, “The notion that unelected lawyers can micromanage the Executive Branch — and override a Commander in Chief who received 77.3 million votes — should trouble every American.”

Mr. Gingrich continued to indict Federal Judges like Boasberg in his testimony. Gingrich highlighted many presidents who disobeyed the Supreme Court within their ability to demonstrate the judges’ unusual behavior. Specifically, Gingrich claimed, “President Andrew Jackson was in constant fights with the Supreme Court. The 1858 senatorial campaign of Abraham Lincoln focused on the Dred Scott decision increasing slavery.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Man Finds out His Twin Sons Are Actually His Brothers

June 27, 2025

My Elderly Neighbor’s Son Destroyed Her Rose Garden to Build a BBQ Area – Our Neighborhood Stood Up for Her

June 27, 2025

My Wife Used $10K from My Daughter’s College Fund for Her Daughter’s Trip and Expected Me to Be Okay with It — I Wasn’t.

June 27, 2025

Man Finds out His Twin Sons Are Actually His Brothers

June 27, 2025

My Elderly Neighbor’s Son Destroyed Her Rose Garden to Build a BBQ Area – Our Neighborhood Stood Up for Her

June 27, 2025

My Wife Used $10K from My Daughter’s College Fund for Her Daughter’s Trip and Expected Me to Be Okay with It — I Wasn’t.

June 27, 2025

Neighbor Hired My Daughter to Babysit for a Week, Then Didn’t Pay – I Was So Angry and Taught Her a Lesson

June 27, 2025
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Contact Us

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}